When comparing Impressionist paintings versus other genres of paintings, it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what defines this period as such an extravagant introduction of paintings. One very famous painting that instantly caught my attention was A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grand Jatte, by Georges Seurat. However, I assume many others will discuss this painting since it is such a remarkable piece of art. Therefore, I will be taking a further look at Gustave Caillebotte’s painting, Paris Street, Rainy Day (on page 991 of Stokstad) and look deeper at the formal elements that compose this piece. A general overview first off, I think that the transition in the formal aspect is an interesting change of pace. Certain characteristics have been withered away, such as the extreme attention to detail in art periods prior to the Impressionism movement.
Something that has stuck out immediately to me was the variation of line and brush stroke techniques. If we were to take a look at the Realism movement style lines, for example, the popular painting The Stone Breakers that we discussed last week during lecture. In comparison to this painting, it is clear to see that each line is clearly defined; figures are almost outlined with lines, enhancing this piece with rich detail and smoothness. On the contrary, within Impressionism pieces, we can easily decipher that most of the figures and buildings have no definite lines that build extreme emphasis towards the subject matter. It is mostly composed of open brushstrokes with various amounts of shades that help build a sense of depth in the piece. The thing I thought was really unique about this painting in particular is that if you glance at the painting in the book from a reasonable distance, it looks very detailed, crisp, and clean. However, if you move your eyes closer to the book, you can see each individual brush stroke on the reflection of the street lamp behind the approaching figures and so forth.
While most critics during this time commented on this emerging Impressionist style as fast, sloppy, and had the looks of being unfinished, I think there is a lot of complexity and dynamics that go into this certain style. Since most of these stylized paintings contain the subject matter of outdoor objects or landscapes, the loose brushstrokes really help bring out the light and color to create more of an understanding of what the audience is really looking at, to not understand the subject matter, but to illustrate the rebirth of the techniques used in these paintings. Even the dynamic of perspective and time helps create a real unique sense of feeling through their artwork, mostly consisting of everyday events, this piece in particular really brings forth and captures all the elements within the downtown streets of Paris. The shades of color throughout the tile on the streets has deep contrast as well which helps add the element of depth as the detail fades from the brushstrokes in the distance.
These elements within the unlooked style of Impressionism contain so many of the obscure compositions while retaining some of the most interesting overall pictures. I personally think that the whole aspect of fast brushstrokes with the unfinished look appears more as excitement for me because it leaves a lot of imagination for the viewer to try and fill in the caps in their own mind. The way it appears as almost photographic quality from a distance and then each brushstroke is revealed with closer viewing distance makes it very intriguing as well, allowing the audience to construct their own inferences based upon the composition. Even the principle of using small canvases (not enormous sized) made it even more remarkable that artists were able to utilize such small space with varying strokes and color shades. All of the colors are pretty controlled, since they help blend in the idea of depth and perception throughout the street-like setting, but they are all very realistic as in comparison to real life outdoor sceneries. I think one of the greatest thing about this painting is the fact that the Caillebotte was able to make the sidewalk the figures are walking on appear to be wet. By blending the reflection of the street light, it really adds a personalized feel to this painting that can only be appreciated from noticing the close individual brushstrokes.


Since I did not write about this art piece, your information was very informative. However, I was somewhat delayed with wondering if you had information to accurately back up your thoughts on the painting, so I read a little about the painting. I liked how you have the picture with your post so it is easier to understand what you are saying and describing about the picture. The only thing I would say is don't assume that others will be talking about the artwork and potentially skip over information that should maybe be talked about. Overall though I liked your blog, and it gave me new insight to the painting as well as the painter and Impressionism in it's entirety. Good job, and thank you for the new knowledge.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad that you didn't write about Seurat! Seurat is better classified as a Post-Impressionist than an Impressionist. You did well to choose this painting by Caillebotte instead, since Caillebotte is more closely associated with Impressionism. We will talk about Caillebotte's art (and how it fits and diverges from Impressionism) in a few weeks.
ReplyDelete-Prof. Bowen
I enjoy how Impressionists utilized many different kinds of brush strokes through out their paintings. I agree that it helps in depicting light and color. Brush strokes can communicate movement and a liveliness in a painting. I think that Gustave Caillebotte’s painting is interesting because it includes the viewer, I feel like I'm right there in 19th century Paris.
ReplyDeleteGreat job on the post! I think it was a great idea for you to talk about this painting especially because it shows the many styles that made up Impressionism. This painting in turn supports what you said at the top of your essay: "it’s hard to pinpoint exactly what defines this period as such an extravagant introduction of paintings". I think you are very right in saying that. For example, the painting that I chose to write about is so completely different than this one, however it still falls under the Impressionism period.
ReplyDelete